Home/Washington Supreme Court/Weitz v. Wagner

Weitz v. Wagner

407 P.2d 456, 67 Wash. 2d 300, 1965 Wash. LEXIS 678
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 4, 1965
DocketNo. 37601
StatusPublished

This text of 407 P.2d 456 (Weitz v. Wagner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weitz v. Wagner, 407 P.2d 456, 67 Wash. 2d 300, 1965 Wash. LEXIS 678 (Wash. 1965).

Opinions

Hunter, J.

— This action arises from injuries sustained by Amelia Weitz, plaintiff (appellant), when she was struck by a car driven by the defendant (respondent), John P. Wagner, in the city of Colfax.

The plaintiff was employed in the courthouse in Colfax. It was her custom to walk home from work. The courthouse is situated on the northeast comer of the intersection of Main and Island Streets. Main Street is the main arterial through the town running north and south; Island Street runs east and west. On the evening of the accident, September 5, 1962, the plaintiff left work shortly after 5 p.m., and crossed Main Street, walking in a westerly direction on the sidewalk on the north side of Island Street. The sidewalk continues for approximately 55 feet from the curbline, after which distance the sidewalk ends and gravel covers the area continuing to the railroad tracks, beyond which the sidewalk again commences. The concrete paving of Island Street also terminates at the end of the stub sidewalk. A narrowed asphalt pavement approximately 21 feet wide then continues west. The north edge of the asphalt is approximately 9 feet south of the north curb-line. The gravel beginning at the end of the sidewalk extends out to the edge of the narrowed asphalt pavement. On the south of the concrete pavement termination of Island Street the curb jogs to the north about 3% feet and then extends west along the south edge of the asphalt pavement. For further illustration of the area, exhibits D and 2 are incorporated herein:

[302]*302

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sawyer v. Department of Labor & Industries
296 P.2d 706 (Washington Supreme Court, 1956)
Shiels v. Purfeerst
235 P.2d 161 (Washington Supreme Court, 1951)
Bergstrom v. Ove
234 P.2d 548 (Washington Supreme Court, 1951)
Adkisson v. City of Seattle
258 P.2d 461 (Washington Supreme Court, 1953)
Sinclair v. Record Press, Inc.
323 P.2d 660 (Washington Supreme Court, 1958)
Roloff v. Bailey
281 P.2d 462 (Washington Supreme Court, 1955)
Miller v. Treat
358 P.2d 143 (Washington Supreme Court, 1960)
Shelton v. Bennett
202 P.2d 461 (Washington Supreme Court, 1949)
Devore v. Longview Public Service Co.
298 P. 717 (Washington Supreme Court, 1931)
Mutti v. Boeing Aircraft Co.
172 P.2d 249 (Washington Supreme Court, 1946)
Harry v. Pratt
285 P. 440 (Washington Supreme Court, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
407 P.2d 456, 67 Wash. 2d 300, 1965 Wash. LEXIS 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weitz-v-wagner-wash-1965.