Weitmann v. Roth

229 A.D. 811

This text of 229 A.D. 811 (Weitmann v. Roth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weitmann v. Roth, 229 A.D. 811 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Order granting motion of defendant Overmeyer to set aside the verdict as against him and directing judgment in his favor against plaintiff reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, motion denied, judgment in favor of defendant Overmeyer vacated, original verdict reinstated, and judgment directed to be entered thereon, with costs. The evidence clearly shows the negligence of defendant Overmeyer and the court erred in setting aside the verdict as against him. Warren v. State of New York (219 App. Div. 124) is not controlling in this case. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Warren v. State
219 A.D. 124 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
229 A.D. 811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weitmann-v-roth-nyappdiv-1930.