Weitling v. Sorenson

247 A.D. 715

This text of 247 A.D. 715 (Weitling v. Sorenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weitling v. Sorenson, 247 A.D. 715 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

This proceeding was commenced by service upon respondents of a notice of motion, dated August 10, 1934, and an affidavit of petitioner, for a summary order directing the respondents (who were the petitioner’s attorneys of record, in an action in the Supreme Court, New York county) to turn over to petitioner, or his attorney, all papers having to do with petitioner’s cause of action. Respondents resisted the motion and asserted liens. The matter was referred to an official referee to take proof and report whether the respondents had forfeited their hens as attorneys on the papers and property of the petitioner. From an order confirming the report of the referee, petitioner appealed. Order modified by reducing the amount of the respondents’ hen to the sum of $3,500, less an unexpended balance deposited for disbursements amounting to $23, making the net amount of the hen the sum of $3,477 with interest thereon from the 6th day of July, 1934; and as so modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present—Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 A.D. 715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weitling-v-sorenson-nyappdiv-1936.