Weisthal v. Arena Building Corp.

232 A.D. 694
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1931·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. In this case defendant offered no proof, and the appeal rests upon questions of law, except that the claim is made that the verdict is excessive. Defendant was in control of the building, including the lights. A violation of subdivision 3 of section 257 of the Labor Law was shown. This was some evidence of negligence and sufficient, at least without explanation from the defendant, to support the cause of action. We do not construe the charge at folio 510, to which exception was taken, to mean that a violation of the section of the Labor Law referred to was conclusive evidence of negligence. Plaintiff’s injuries were serious and undisputed. We cannot hold that the verdict is excessive.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weisthal v. Arena Building Corp., 232 A.D. 694 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

232 A.D. 694 (Weisthal v. Arena Building Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daurizio v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.
152 Misc. 716 (New York Supreme Court, 1934)