Weister v. Young

109 A. 155, 265 Pa. 393, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 565
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 22, 1919
DocketAppeal, No. 121
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 109 A. 155 (Weister v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weister v. Young, 109 A. 155, 265 Pa. 393, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 565 (Pa. 1919).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The third clause of the will of Elizabeth Weister is as follows: “I give and bequeath to my sons John and Jacob H. all my real estate consisting of the farm near North Washington now occupied by J.' B. Carnahan. At the death of either son the surviving son is to become sole heir. And at the death of both sons, if either have any heir's, it is to be divided among the heirs, share and share alike.” The two sons designated by the testatrix as John and Jacob H. are W. J. and J. H. Weister, the appellees, both of whom are still living. The correct conclusion of the learned court below was that, under the first sentence of the quoted clause of their mother’s will, they took an absolute title to the farm, and this without regard to anything contained in the second and third sentences. The judgment in their favor on the case stated is accordingly affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bagley's Estate
48 Pa. D. & C. 173 (Bedford County Orphans' Court, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 A. 155, 265 Pa. 393, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weister-v-young-pa-1919.