Weist v. State

401 S.W.2d 565, 240 Ark. 680, 1966 Ark. LEXIS 1374
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedApril 18, 1966
Docket5160
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 401 S.W.2d 565 (Weist v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weist v. State, 401 S.W.2d 565, 240 Ark. 680, 1966 Ark. LEXIS 1374 (Ark. 1966).

Opinion

George Rose Smith, Justice.

The appellant was convicted of negligent homicide upon proof that his drunken driving caused a traffic collision in which Don Taylor Gazaway was killed. The jury fixed the penalty at imprisonment for one year and a fine of $500.00.

For reversal the appellant urges a single point, that the trial court erred in permitting the prosecuting attorney, over the objection of defense counsel, to ask the witness Gage if he knew that the accused drank. A com: píete answer to this contention is simply that the question was never answered; so there could have been no prejudice. Reynolds v. State, 220 Ark. 188, 246 S. W. 2d 724 (1952).

Affirmed.

Amsler, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jeremy Edward Lee v. State of Arkansas
2025 Ark. App. 515 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2025)
Utley v. State
237 S.W.3d 27 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
401 S.W.2d 565, 240 Ark. 680, 1966 Ark. LEXIS 1374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weist-v-state-ark-1966.