Weissman v. Skolnick
This text of 259 A.D.2d 541 (Weissman v. Skolnick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In related actions, inter alia, to permanently enjoin the defendants from interfering with the use of an alleged easement over part of a road [542]*542contiguous to the defendants’ property, the defendants in action No. 3 appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D’Emilio, J.), dated August 14, 1997, which granted the plaintiff’s motion to confirm the Referee’s report in her favor and for summary judgment in her favor, and denied their cross motion to dismiss the action.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The appellants’ claim that the respondent improperly failed to name the adjoining property owners as parties to this action is without merit, inasmuch as the interests of the other two landowners would not be affected by a judgment declaring the respondent’s rights as to Library Avenue Extension and enjoining the appellants from interfering with that use (see, Cannon v Sikora, 142 AD2d 662). Moreover, the record supports the Referee’s determination as to the respondent’s easement (see, Cashman v Shutter, 226 AD2d 961; Heim v Conroy, 211 AD2d 868).
The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, J. P., Ritter, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 A.D.2d 541, 686 N.Y.S.2d 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weissman-v-skolnick-nyappdiv-1999.