Weissblum v. Mostafzafan Foundation

451 N.E.2d 490, 59 N.Y.2d 815, 464 N.Y.S.2d 743, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3150
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 7, 1983·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order reversed, with costs, defendant’s motion to vacate its [817] default denied and question certified answered in the negative for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice Arthur Markewich at the Appellate Division (90 AD2d 741).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, and Simons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weissblum v. Mostafzafan Foundation, 451 N.E.2d 490, 59 N.Y.2d 815, 464 N.Y.S.2d 743, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3150 (N.Y. 1983).

451 N.E.2d 490 (Weissblum v. Mostafzafan Foundation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weissblum v. Mostafzafan Foundation
99 A.D.2d 704 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Kane v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
97 A.D.2d 692 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Weissblum v. MOSTAFZAFAN FOUND. OF NEW YORK
454 N.E.2d 1306 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)