Weiss Vs. Dist. Ct. (Tait)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MAX WEISS, No. 79164 Petitioner, VS.

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE

AU6 0 8 2019 ELIZABETH A. DROWN

CHARLES J. HOSKIN, DISTRICT CLERK• F SUPREME COURT JUDGE, BY DEPUTY CLERK

Respondents,

and CHANDRA TAIT, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus, or in the alternative, prohibition, seeking an order directing the district court to reverse its decisions • declaring petitioner a vexatious litigant, reverse its decision awarding real party in interest attorney fees, and re-open petitioners order to show cause and subsequent motion, and strike two orders after hearing.

Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition").

Therefore, without deciding on the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(01 1947A .40.

q -334410S

88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) CPetitioned carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Pidem.4 , J.

Pickering Hardesty

cc: Hon. Charles J. Hoskin, District Judge, Family Court Division Max Weiss Chandra Tait Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I947A

2

A

-fakit& A i: