Weiss v. Zuckerman
This text of 114 A.D.2d 895 (Weiss v. Zuckerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenstein, J.), entered March 9, 1984, which, upon the motion of defendant for judgment as a matter of law made at the conclusion of the presentation of evidence by plaintiff, dismissed his complaint for failure to make out a prima facie case.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
In order to establish a prima facie case of medical malpractice, expert testimony is required to establish proximate cause unless the causal relationship is readily apparent to the trier of fact (Lipsius v White, 91 AD2d 271). In this case, it is not readily apparent that the alleged damages were caused by the alleged malpractice of defendant. Since a jury may not be permitted to speculate as to the cause of an injury, expert opinion evidence was needed in order for plaintiff to establish a prima facie case (Hirsch v Safian, 257 App Div 212). As none was offered, the complaint was properly dismissed. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
114 A.D.2d 895, 495 N.Y.S.2d 69, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiss-v-zuckerman-nyappdiv-1985.