Weiss v. Weiss

201 A.D.2d 645, 609 N.Y.S.2d 831, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1438
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Weiss v. Weiss. Read the opinion of the Court — 186 A.D.2d 247

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Amann, J.), entered October 29, 1991, which, upon a jury verdict, inter alia, is in favor of the defendants and against them dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs’ contention that the Supreme Court improperly discussed its response to a note from the jury in the presence of the jury is unpreserved for appellate review (see, Horowitz v Incorporated Vil. of Roslyn, 144 AD2d 639, 641-642). In any event, we find that the Supreme Court’s response to the note was proper, and that the court correctly declined to reinstruct the jury as requested by counsel for the plaintiffs (see, Continental Natl. Bank v Tradesmen’s Natl. Bank, 173 [646]*646NY 272, 286). Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weiss v. Weiss, 201 A.D.2d 645, 609 N.Y.S.2d 831, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1438 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

201 A.D.2d 645 (Weiss v. Weiss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Continental National Bank v. Tradesmen's National Bank
65 N.E. 1103 (New York Court of Appeals, 1903)
Horowitz v. Incorporated Village of Roslyn
144 A.D.2d 639 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)