Weiss v. Weiss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weiss v. Weiss

43 A.D.2d 749, 351 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2819

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 31, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 43 A.D.2d 749 (Weiss v. Weiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weiss v. Weiss, 43 A.D.2d 749, 351 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2819 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action in which a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, was entered on December 8, 1972, granting plaintiff a divorce after a nonjury trial, he [750]*750appeals from so much of the judgment as awarded defendant $600 per month alimony, $80 per month ¡support for each of the two children of the parties and $2,000 as a counsel fee. Judgment modified, on the law and the facts and in the interests of justice, by reducing the award for alimony to $425 per month. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. In our opinion, the award for alimony was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Munder, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Shapiro, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action in which a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, was entered on December 8, 1972, granting plaintiff a divorce after a nonjury trial, he [750]*750appeals from so much of the judgment as awarded defendant $600 per month alimony, $80 per month ¡support for each of the two children of the parties and $2,000 as a counsel fee. Judgment modified, on the law and the facts and in the interests of justice, by reducing the award for alimony to $425 per month. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. In our opinion, the award for alimony was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Munder, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Shapiro, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 A.D.2d 749, 351 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiss-v-weiss-nyappdiv-1973.