Weiss v. Weiss

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Weiss v. Weiss

508 So. 2d 44, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1436, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8734

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 10, 1987

DocketNo. 4-86-2082

StatusPublished

This text of 508 So. 2d 44 (Weiss v. Weiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weiss v. Weiss, 508 So. 2d 44, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1436, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8734 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order in all respects except its failure, in calculating the husband’s arrearage, to give appropriate credit to the husband for those periods in which the wife’s gross income exceeded his. We view it to have been the intent of the trial judge who entered the final judgment of dissolution to effect equalization, regardless of which spouse’s gross income was higher. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the purpose of effecting that intent.

DOWNEY, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order in all respects except its failure, in calculating the husband’s arrearage, to give appropriate credit to the husband for those periods in which the wife’s gross income exceeded his. We view it to have been the intent of the trial judge who entered the final judgment of dissolution to effect equalization, regardless of which spouse’s gross income was higher. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the purpose of effecting that intent.

DOWNEY, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

508 So. 2d 44, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1436, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiss-v-weiss-fladistctapp-1987.