Weiss v. United States

E.D. New York

Weiss v. United States

116 F. Supp. 959, 1953 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2347

District Court, E.D. New York·Decided May 14, 1953·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

GALSTON, District Judge.

However one may read the present complaint, the compelling inference is that the plaintiff is entitled to no relief. The reasons therefor are abundantly set forth in two decisions of this court, with affirmances of the United States Court of Appeals in the consideration of two prior complaints, 92 F.Supp. 322, 187 F.2d 610, 103 F.Supp. 470, 199 F.2d 454, and certiorari denied in both cases. The policies lapsed and have not been revived by any subsequent legislation. Motion granted. Settle order.

Affirmed 207 F.2d 503.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GALSTON, District Judge.

However one may read the present complaint, the compelling inference is that the plaintiff is entitled to no relief. The reasons therefor are abundantly set forth in two decisions of this court, with affirmances of the United States Court of Appeals in the consideration of two prior complaints, 92 F.Supp. 322, 187 F.2d 610, 103 F.Supp. 470, 199 F.2d 454, and certiorari denied in both cases. The policies lapsed and have not been revived by any subsequent legislation. Motion granted. Settle order.

Affirmed 207 F.2d 503.

Weiss v. United States, 116 F. Supp. 959, 1953 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2347 (E.D.N.Y. 1953).

Pincite

116 F. Supp. 959 (Weiss v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related