Weiss v. Spitzer

46 A.D.3d 675, 848 N.Y.S.2d 237
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 11, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 46 A.D.3d 675 (Weiss v. Spitzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weiss v. Spitzer, 46 A.D.3d 675, 848 N.Y.S.2d 237 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to compel the determination of claims to real property, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jacobson, J.), dated September 25, 2006, which granted the motion of their attorney, inter alia, for leave to withdraw as counsel.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

An attorney may be permitted to withdraw from employment where a client refuses to pay reasonable legal fees (see Winters v Winters, 25 AD3d 601, 602 [2006]; Kay v Kay, 245 AD2d 549, 550 [1997]; Stephen Eldridge Realty Corp. v Green, 174 AD2d 564, 565 [1991]). Here, the record establishes that the plaintiffs were almost $3,000 in arrears in payment of their legal fees, which they had promised to pay within 10 days of billing pursuant to a retainer agreement. Moreover, the plaintiffs accused their attorney of incompetence and did not dispute that he no longer maintains an office in New York. Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the motion, inter alia, for leave to withdraw as the plaintiffs’ counsel (see Code of Professional Responsibility DR 2-110 [c] [1] [d], [f] [22 NYCRR 1200.15 (c) (1) (iv), (vi)]; Code of Professional Responsibility DR 2-110 [c] [6] [22 NYCRR 1200.15 (c) (6)]; Galvano v Galvano, 193 AD2d 779, 780 [1993]).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions either are without merit or have been rendered academic by our determination. Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Florio and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

61 E. 72nd St. Corp. v. Modell
2024 NY Slip Op 32160(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Clingerman v. Ali
2024 NY Slip Op 31996(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Villata v. Kokkinos
2019 NY Slip Op 2143 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Applebaum v. Einstein
2018 NY Slip Op 5437 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Aragona v. Shaibani
138 A.D.3d 649 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Musachio v. Musachio
80 A.D.3d 738 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Misek-Falkoff v. Metropolitan Transit Authority
65 A.D.3d 576 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 A.D.3d 675, 848 N.Y.S.2d 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiss-v-spitzer-nyappdiv-2007.