Weiss v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 22-0409V
ARLENE WEISS, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner, Filed: February 25, 2026 v.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
David John Carney, Green & Schafle LLC, Philadelphia, PA, for Petitioner.
Irene Angelica Firippis, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
On April 8, 2022, Arlene Weiss filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine she received on October 28, 2022. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On December 5, 2025, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation. On February 24, 2026, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded a total of $42,500.00 for her pain and suffering. Proffer at 2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $42,500.00 (for pain and suffering), to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
ARLENE WEISS,
Petitioner,
v. No. 22-409V Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION 1
On April 8, 2022, Arlene Weiss (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or
“Act”), as amended, alleging that she sustained a shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”), as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table, following an influenza (“flu”)
vaccination she received on September 11, 2020. Petition at 1, 8.
On May 3, 2023, petitioner filed a Motion for Ruling on the Record (“Motion”). ECF No.
20. On August 21, 2023, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed a
combined response to the Motion and Rule 4(c) Report indicating that this case was not
appropriate for compensation under the terms of the Act for a SIRVA Table injury. ECF No. 27.
Petitioner filed a reply on September 8, 2023. ECF No. 28. On December 5, 2025, the Chief
Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation. ECF
No. 30.
1 This Proffer does not include attorneys’ fees and costs, which the parties intend to address after the Damages Decision is issued. I. Items of Compensation
Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded
a lump sum of $42,500.00 for pain and suffering. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner
agrees.
This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
II. Form of the Award/Recommended Payment
The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
through a lump sum payment as described below and request that the Chief Special Master’s
decision and the Court’s judgment award the following 2:
A lump sum payment of $42,500.00 to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner.
Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this
case.
Respectfully submitted,
BRETT A. SHUMATE Assistant Attorney General
JONATHAN D. GUYNN Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division
HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division
GABRIELLE M. FIELDING Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division 2 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.
2 /s/ Irene A. Firippis IRENE A. FIRIPPIS Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146, Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 305-3250 E-mail: irene.a.firippis@usdoj.gov
Dated: February 24, 2026
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weiss v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Weiss v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.