Weiss v. Schelsky

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Weiss v. Schelsky

134 A. 926, 4 N.J. Misc. 840, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 112

DecidedOctober 7, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 134 A. 926 (Weiss v. Schelsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weiss v. Schelsky, 134 A. 926, 4 N.J. Misc. 840, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 112 (N.J. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The certiorari in this case was allowed to review an order made on the 16th day of. November, 1925, in the Perth Amboy District Court, setting aside and quashing á writ of attachment issued out of that court. The order was 'based on the fact that the defendant, Joe Sehelsky, was a resident of the state at the time the writ of attachment was issued. Our reading of the testimony taken before the judge of the District Court leads us to the same conclusion as. that of the judge of the District Court. The order of the court setting aside the writ of attachment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The certiorari in this case was allowed to review an order made on the 16th day of. November, 1925, in the Perth Amboy District Court, setting aside and quashing á writ of attachment issued out of that court. The order was 'based on the fact that the defendant, Joe Sehelsky, was a resident of the state at the time the writ of attachment was issued. Our reading of the testimony taken before the judge of the District Court leads us to the same conclusion as. that of the judge of the District Court. The order of the court setting aside the writ of attachment is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 A. 926, 4 N.J. Misc. 840, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiss-v-schelsky-nj-1926.