Weiss v. Morris Rosenbloom & Co.

410 So. 2d 1005, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28613
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 16, 1982
DocketNo. 81-1453
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 410 So. 2d 1005 (Weiss v. Morris Rosenbloom & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weiss v. Morris Rosenbloom & Co., 410 So. 2d 1005, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28613 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, judgment debtor in the State of New York, appeals a final judgment establishing and enforcing the foreign judgment in the State of Florida. He complains that numerous telephone calls from Florida to New York could not subject him to New York’s “long arm” statute in a suit filed therein to collect monies due for products shipped to him. We disagree, and affirm. Silitronic Chemical Corporation v. R.K.M. Enterprises, 197 So.2d 33 (Fla.3d DCA 1967); International Shoe Company v. State of Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 66 S.Ct. 154, 90 L.Ed. 95 (1947); Parke-Bernet Galleries, Inc. v. Franklyn, 26 N.Y.2d 13, 308 N.Y.S.2d 337, 256 N.E.2d 506 (1970); N.Y.Civ.Proc., § 306 (McKinney 1972).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Freeman v. Holmgaard
466 So. 2d 1166 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
410 So. 2d 1005, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiss-v-morris-rosenbloom-co-fladistctapp-1982.