Weiss v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co.

Superior Court of New York

Weiss v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co.

18 N.Y.S. 956

CourtThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

DecidedMarch 14, 1892

StatusPublished

This text of 18 N.Y.S. 956 (Weiss v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weiss v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co., 18 N.Y.S. 956 (superctny 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Gildersleeve, J.

The judgment permits the defendants to pay to the plaintiffs the sum of $1,700 in avoidance of the injunction restraining the defendants from maintaining and operating their elevated railroad in front of plaintiffs’ premises Ho. 952, Second avenue, in the city of Hew York, and awards to the plaintiffs the sum of $878.31 as past damages, and interest thereon, and $132.43 as costs and disbursements. The case seems to have been carefully tried by the learned referee, and we find no errors in the admission Or rejection of evidence that require a reversal of the judgment. The evidence fairly sustains the findings of the referee, and warrants the judgment. It therefore follows that the judgment appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gildersleeve, J.

The judgment permits the defendants to pay to the plaintiffs the sum of $1,700 in avoidance of the injunction restraining the defendants from maintaining and operating their elevated railroad in front of plaintiffs’ premises Ho. 952, Second avenue, in the city of Hew York, and awards to the plaintiffs the sum of $878.31 as past damages, and interest thereon, and $132.43 as costs and disbursements. The case seems to have been carefully tried by the learned referee, and we find no errors in the admission Or rejection of evidence that require a reversal of the judgment. The evidence fairly sustains the findings of the referee, and warrants the judgment. It therefore follows that the judgment appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 N.Y.S. 956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiss-v-metropolitan-el-ry-co-superctny-1892.