Weiss v. Max

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Weiss v. Max

40 A.2d 572, 136 N.J. Eq. 100, 1945 N.J. LEXIS 374

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 4, 1945·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant brings this appeal because her bill to impose a trust in her favor was dismissed on grounds stated in the opinion below, and also because of lack of proof to sustain the contentions. A careful examination of the record and briefs satisfies us that the decree should be affirmed.

The decree is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Pbrskie, Porter, Colie, Wells, Rae-, eerty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversed — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appellant brings this appeal because her bill to impose a trust in her favor was dismissed on grounds stated in the opinion below, and also because of lack of proof to sustain the contentions. A careful examination of the record and briefs satisfies us that the decree should be affirmed.

The decree is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Pbrskie, Porter, Colie, Wells, Rae-, eerty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversed — None.

Weiss v. Max, 40 A.2d 572, 136 N.J. Eq. 100, 1945 N.J. LEXIS 374 (N.J. 1945).

Pincite

40 A.2d 572 (Weiss v. Max) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.