Weiss v. Max

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Weiss v. Max

40 A.2d 572, 136 N.J. Eq. 100, 1945 N.J. LEXIS 374

DecidedJanuary 4, 1945

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.2d 572 (Weiss v. Max) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weiss v. Max, 40 A.2d 572, 136 N.J. Eq. 100, 1945 N.J. LEXIS 374 (N.J. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant brings this appeal because her bill to impose a trust in her favor was dismissed on grounds stated in the opinion below, and also because of lack of proof to sustain the contentions. A careful examination of the record and briefs satisfies us that the decree should be affirmed.

The decree is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Pbrskie, Porter, Colie, Wells, Rae-, eerty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversed — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appellant brings this appeal because her bill to impose a trust in her favor was dismissed on grounds stated in the opinion below, and also because of lack of proof to sustain the contentions. A careful examination of the record and briefs satisfies us that the decree should be affirmed.

The decree is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Pbrskie, Porter, Colie, Wells, Rae-, eerty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversed — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.2d 572, 136 N.J. Eq. 100, 1945 N.J. LEXIS 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiss-v-max-nj-1945.