Weiss v. Goldman

120 So. 2d 812, 1960 Fla. App. LEXIS 2565
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 26, 1960·No. No. 59-408·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in a personal injury action has appealed from á judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict finding defendant guilty of negligence and awarding damages in the amount of $795.55 plus’ costs. This award was less than the plaintiff’s total out-of-pocket expenses. Motion for new trial, made by the plaintiff, was denied and [813] judgment was entered pursuant to the jury’s verdict.

The sole point raised is whether the trial court erred in denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial upon the contention damages awarded were inadequate because the jury failed to consider all the elements of damages involved.

Having heard oral argument and considered the record and briefs, we conclude the judgment appealed should be affirmed upon the authority of Chomont v. Ward, Fla.1958, 103 So.2d 635. See Glasser v. Leary, Fla.1953, 67 So.2d 683.

HORTON, C. J., PEARSON, J., and MILLEDGE, STANLEY, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weiss v. Goldman, 120 So. 2d 812, 1960 Fla. App. LEXIS 2565 (Fla. Ct. App. 1960).

120 So. 2d 812 (Weiss v. Goldman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dyes v. Spick
606 So. 2d 700 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Sweeney v. Wiggins
350 So. 2d 536 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Ingle v. Cochran
151 So. 2d 63 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Goldstein v. Walters
126 So. 2d 759 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)