Weiss v. G & S Management Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weiss v. G & S Management Corp.

163 A.D.2d 520

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 18, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 163 A.D.2d 520 (Weiss v. G & S Management Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weiss v. G & S Management Corp., 163 A.D.2d 520 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and pain and suffering, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Zelman, J.), dated August 15, 1988, which denied renewal of their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants contend that the trial court abused its discretion in determining that the plaintiff’s stipulation of settlement in a related action did not constitute new evidence warranting consideration of its renewed motion for summary judgment. Although the trial court erred in holding that no new evidence was presented, it correctly denied summary judgment. We find that the defendants have failed to establish a prima facie entitlement to such relief (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557; Fox v Wyeth Labs., 129 AD2d 611). Bracken, J. P., Rubin, Eiber, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and pain and suffering, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Zelman, J.), dated August 15, 1988, which denied renewal of their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants contend that the trial court abused its discretion in determining that the plaintiff’s stipulation of settlement in a related action did not constitute new evidence warranting consideration of its renewed motion for summary judgment. Although the trial court erred in holding that no new evidence was presented, it correctly denied summary judgment. We find that the defendants have failed to establish a prima facie entitlement to such relief (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557; Fox v Wyeth Labs., 129 AD2d 611). Bracken, J. P., Rubin, Eiber, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 A.D.2d 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiss-v-g-s-management-corp-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack