Weiss v. Fote

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weiss v. Fote

8 A.D.2d 692, 186 N.Y.S.2d 223, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8871

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 29, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 692 (Weiss v. Fote) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weiss v. Fote, 8 A.D.2d 692, 186 N.Y.S.2d 223, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8871 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, amended judgment and order affirmed, with costs to plaintiff against defendant City of Buffalo. All concur. (Appeal by defendant city from judgment and amended judgment of Erie Trial Term for plaintiff and against said defendant in an action for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff by reason of negligent operation of intersection signals; the amended judgment directed judgment in favor of defendants Fote and Alexander against plaintiff. The order denied a motion by defendant city for a new trial; also appeal by plaintiff from so much of the judgment as amended as adjudged that defendants Fote and Alexander have judgment against plaintiff on the issues.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Kimball, Williams, Bastow and Goldman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, amended judgment and order affirmed, with costs to plaintiff against defendant City of Buffalo. All concur. (Appeal by defendant city from judgment and amended judgment of Erie Trial Term for plaintiff and against said defendant in an action for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff by reason of negligent operation of intersection signals; the amended judgment directed judgment in favor of defendants Fote and Alexander against plaintiff. The order denied a motion by defendant city for a new trial; also appeal by plaintiff from so much of the judgment as amended as adjudged that defendants Fote and Alexander have judgment against plaintiff on the issues.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Kimball, Williams, Bastow and Goldman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 692, 186 N.Y.S.2d 223, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiss-v-fote-nyappdiv-1959.