Weiss v. Farson

230 A.D. 738

This text of 230 A.D. 738 (Weiss v. Farson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weiss v. Farson, 230 A.D. 738 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Order setting aside the verdict of the jury in favor of the plaintiff for $18,279 unless the plaintiff shall stipulate to reduce said verdict to $12,279, reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, verdict reinstated and judgment directed to be entered thereon, with costs. While this court is reluctant to interfere with the exercise of discretion by the trial court in reducing the verdict (Fitzgerald v. New York Central R. R. Co., 215 App. Div. 1), we are of opinion that there was sufficient evidence from which the jury might find that plaintiff’s epilepsy resulted from the accident and that the verdict under the circumstances is not excessive. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fitzgerald v. New York Central Railroad
215 A.D. 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 A.D. 738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiss-v-farson-nyappdiv-1930.