Weiss v. Farrell (Connor)

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Weiss v. Farrell (Connor)

177 A. 225, 116 Pa. Super. 591, 1935 Pa. Super. LEXIS 347

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 1, 1935

DocketAppeal 261

StatusPublished

This text of 177 A. 225 (Weiss v. Farrell (Connor)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weiss v. Farrell (Connor), 177 A. 225, 116 Pa. Super. 591, 1935 Pa. Super. LEXIS 347 (Pa. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The facts in this case are precisely the same as those in the case of Anna Marmar v. Frank F. Farrell and Daniel F. Connor, an opinion in which case was handed down this day, 116 Pa. Superior Ct. 586, A. 177 225. The plaintiff in this case was another minor riding in the same car at the time of the automobile collision. The cases were argued together and, for the reasons therein given, the judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The facts in this case are precisely the same as those in the case of Anna Marmar v. Frank F. Farrell and Daniel F. Connor, an opinion in which case was handed down this day, 116 Pa. Superior Ct. 586, A. 177 225. The plaintiff in this case was another minor riding in the same car at the time of the automobile collision. The cases were argued together and, for the reasons therein given, the judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 A. 225, 116 Pa. Super. 591, 1935 Pa. Super. LEXIS 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiss-v-farrell-connor-pasuperct-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack