Weiss v. Daytona Grand, Inc.

197 So. 3d 1139, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9671, 2016 WL 3458416
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 24, 2016·No. 5D15-1923·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Miles Weiss appeals the order entered by the trial court denying his motion to intervene and issuing a temporary injunction in favor of Daytona Grand, Inc. Although filed as an appeal of a non-final order, we sua sponte have reviewed this case as a final appeal, in that the denial of a motion to intervene is a final appealable order. See Superior Fence & Rail of N. Fla. v. Lucas, 35 So.3d 104 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010). 1 Determining that no abuse of discretion by the trial court has been shown, we affirm the denial of the motion to intervene. In light of that determination, Weiss lacks standing to challenge the temporary injunction order. See Mkt. Tampa Invs., LLC v. Stobaugh, 177 So.3d 31 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, TORPY and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
1

. The appendices filed by the parties provided the court with an adequate basis upon which to decide the case and, therefore, the court did not order a record to be transmitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weiss v. Daytona Grand, Inc., 197 So. 3d 1139, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9671, 2016 WL 3458416 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

197 So. 3d 1139 (Weiss v. Daytona Grand, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

SUPERIOR FENCE & RAIL OF NORTH FLORIDA v. Lucas
35 So. 3d 104 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Market Tampa Investments, LLC v. Stobaugh
177 So. 3d 31 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)