Weiss v. Courshon

627 So. 2d 604, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12383, 1993 WL 502286
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 7, 1993·No. No. 93-866·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Patricia Poliak Weiss and Thomas Poliak appeal an order denying their motion to intervene. We entirely agree with the substance of the trial court’s ruling, which granted Weiss and Poliak certain notification rights, but denied them full party status. In light of the recent decision in Union Central Life Insurance Co. v. Carlisle, 593 So.2d 505 (Fla.1992), it is more accurate to say that the order under review is one which grants limited intervention. With that technical modification in terminology, we affirm the order under review. We emphasize that this change in terminology in the order does not confer on appellants any other or greater rights than those delineated in the trial court’s order.

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weiss v. Courshon, 627 So. 2d 604, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12383, 1993 WL 502286 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

627 So. 2d 604 (Weiss v. Courshon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weiss v. Berkett
907 So. 2d 1181 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)