Weiss v. Clamitz

203 Ill. App. 246, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 193
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJanuary 17, 1917
DocketGen. No. 21,461
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 203 Ill. App. 246 (Weiss v. Clamitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weiss v. Clamitz, 203 Ill. App. 246, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 193 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gtoodwih

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Vendor and purchaser, § 81*—what does not constitute waiver of condition in contract.' Where a contract for the sale of land provides that the land shall he subject to a specified incumbrance, an agreement to change the terms of the contract so as to permit an incumbrance materially different from the one originally provided for does not constitute a waiver of the condition. 2. Evidence, § 322*—when parol evidence inadmissible to vary terms of contract. Where a contract for the sale of real property provides that the land shall he subject to a specified incumbrance, payable at specified periods, evidence that an agreement to change the terms of the contract so as to permit an incumbrance materially different from the one originally provided for is inadmissible as an attempt to vary the terms of a written document by parol evidence. 3. Vendor and purchaser, § 325*—when purchaser is entitled to repayment of earnest money. Where a contract for the sale of real estate provides that the land shall he subject to a specified incumbrance payable at specified periods, and the vendor is unable to furnish a conveyance subject only to such incumbrance within the time stipulated by the contract, the purchaser is not in default- and is entitled to recover earnest money deposited under the contract, 4. Appeal and error, § 1810*—when final judgment will be entered in Appellate Court upon reversal. Where, in an action by the purchaser of real estate against a vendor to recover earnest money paid under the contract, there is no dispute in regard to the amount, the Appellate Court upon reversing a judgment for defendant will enter final judgment for the amount claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clark v. Henderson
244 N.W. 314 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 Ill. App. 246, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiss-v-clamitz-illappct-1917.