Weiss v. City of Los Angeles

213 P. 979, 190 Cal. 576, 1923 Cal. LEXIS 580
California Supreme Court·Decided March 9, 1923·No. L. A. No. 7176.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

This is an action by a taxpayer to enjoin the carrying out of a certain purchase agreement entered into between the city of Los Angeles and the Southern California Edison Company. In his reply brief the appellant states:

"Notwithstanding the fact that pending this appeal the so-called 'purchase agreement,' the subject of this litigation, has been carried into effect, and under the circumstances the questions urged upon this appeal have become moot and purely academic, counsel desires to submit this case upon its merits."

The case having become moot, the appeal is dismissed.

Wilbur, C. J., Lawlor, J., Lennon, J., Seawell, J., Kerrigan, J., and Waste, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weiss v. City of Los Angeles, 213 P. 979, 190 Cal. 576, 1923 Cal. LEXIS 580 (Cal. 1923).

213 P. 979 (Weiss v. City of Los Angeles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mitchell v. Warren
213 P.2d 413 (California Court of Appeal, 1950)
Garibaldi v. City of Daly
143 P.2d 397 (California Court of Appeal, 1943)
Peoples State Bank v. Imperial Irrigation District
101 P.2d 466 (California Supreme Court, 1940)
Atkins v. Hughes
282 P. 787 (California Supreme Court, 1929)