Weiss v. Aurora Bank FSB

Missouri Court of Appeals

Weiss v. Aurora Bank FSB

380 S.W.3d 612, 2012 WL 4078918, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1152

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 18, 2012·No. No. ED 97730·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tom Weiss appeals from the award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) denying him unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there was sufficient competent and substantial evidence to support the Commission’s award. Berwin v. Lindenwood Female College, 205 S.W.3d 291, 294 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no prece-[613] dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tom Weiss appeals from the award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) denying him unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there was sufficient competent and substantial evidence to support the Commission’s award. Berwin v. Lindenwood Female College, 205 S.W.3d 291, 294 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no prece-[613] dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Weiss v. Aurora Bank FSB, 380 S.W.3d 612, 2012 WL 4078918, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1152 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

380 S.W.3d 612 (Weiss v. Aurora Bank FSB) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related