Weisman v. State
703 So. 2d 1218, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 18, 1998 WL 2493
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 2, 1998
DocketNo. 97-606
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 703 So. 2d 1218 (Weisman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Weisman v. State, 703 So. 2d 1218, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 18, 1998 WL 2493 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
Opinion
In this Anders case, investigative costs were improperly imposed as a condition of probation when no request was made and no documentation provided, so the costs must be stricken. See Bisson v. State, 696 So.2d 504 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). In all other respects, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.
AFFIRMED; INVESTIGATIVE COSTS STRICKEN.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mitts Boyle & Associates v. Boyle Accounting Services
703 So. 2d 1218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
703 So. 2d 1218, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 18, 1998 WL 2493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weisman-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.