Weisman v. Rothenstein

192 A.D. 919

Opinion

Order granting new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence reversed, with costs, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to plaintiff to renew such motion if so advised upon a proper case as required by law. (Code Civ. Proc. § 997; Davis v. Grand Rapids Fire Ins. Co., 5 App. Div. 36; Pease v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 137 id. 458; Russell v. Randall, 123 N. Y. 436; Bantleon v. Meier, 81 Hun, 162.) Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weisman v. Rothenstein, 192 A.D. 919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).

192 A.D. 919 (Weisman v. Rothenstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Russell v. . Randall
25 N.E. 931 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
Davis v. Grand Rapids Fire Insurance
5 A.D. 36 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
Bantheon v. Meier
30 N.Y.S. 706 (New York Supreme Court, 1894)