Weisman v. Rothenstein

192 A.D. 919

This text of 192 A.D. 919 (Weisman v. Rothenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weisman v. Rothenstein, 192 A.D. 919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Order granting new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence reversed, with costs, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to plaintiff to renew such motion if so advised upon a proper case as required by law. (Code Civ. Proc. § 997; Davis v. Grand Rapids Fire Ins. Co., 5 App. Div. 36; Pease v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 137 id. 458; Russell v. Randall, 123 N. Y. 436; Bantleon v. Meier, 81 Hun, 162.) Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Russell v. . Randall
25 N.E. 931 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
Davis v. Grand Rapids Fire Insurance
5 A.D. 36 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
Bantheon v. Meier
30 N.Y.S. 706 (New York Supreme Court, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 A.D. 919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weisman-v-rothenstein-nyappdiv-1920.