Weisman v. Hyams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weisman v. Hyams

5 A.D.2d 1000, 173 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6311

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1958

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 A.D.2d 1000 (Weisman v. Hyams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weisman v. Hyams, 5 A.D.2d 1000, 173 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6311 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Action by the owner of a motor vehicle to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have -been received when her motor vehicle, in which she was riding and which was being operated by the intestate, George Butler, collided with a motor vehicle owned and operated by defendant Gerald Cassevah. At the close of the case the amended complaint was dismissed, by consent, as to Cassevah, and the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the administratrix. The appeal is ■from so much of the judgment entered thereon as dismissed the amended complaint as against the administratrix, and from an order denying a motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. Judgment insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Appeal from order dismissed, without costs. No such order is printed in the record.

Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by the owner of a motor vehicle to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have -been received when her motor vehicle, in which she was riding and which was being operated by the intestate, George Butler, collided with a motor vehicle owned and operated by defendant Gerald Cassevah. At the close of the case the amended complaint was dismissed, by consent, as to Cassevah, and the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the administratrix. The appeal is ■from so much of the judgment entered thereon as dismissed the amended complaint as against the administratrix, and from an order denying a motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. Judgment insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Appeal from order dismissed, without costs. No such order is printed in the record.

Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.D.2d 1000, 173 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weisman-v-hyams-nyappdiv-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack