Weisman v. Firemen's Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Weisman v. Firemen's Insurance

95 N.E. 411, 208 Mass. 577, 1911 Mass. LEXIS 878

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedMay 17, 1911

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 95 N.E. 411 (Weisman v. Firemen's Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weisman v. Firemen's Insurance, 95 N.E. 411, 208 Mass. 577, 1911 Mass. LEXIS 878 (Mass. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Braley, J.

The exceptions are meagre almost to the point of obscurity, but we assume that the policy was issued under R L. c. 118, § 60, and that the terms of the policy required as a condition precedent to any right of action, that the amount of loss should be ascertained by arbitration. Bub if the judge was satisfied that arbitrators were duly chosen, who met, heard the parties, and prepared and signed an award determining the loss on the plaintiff’s stock and furniture, he also found that it was not delivered, or notice of their decision communicated to either party. The form of submission is not before us. It may have been oral or in writing, and may or may not have provided that notice should be given. The company, however, declined to adjust the insurance after notice and proof of loss had been given, and, if we infer that thereupon at the plaintiff’s request three referees were selected as stated in the record, the purpose of the arbitration clause would be nullified, unless in some suitable form the result of the reference was made known to the plaintiff and the defendant. The board acts as an arbitral tribunal whose [579]*579decision, if accepted by the insurer, determines the amount of liability, while, if rejected, the insured may sue at once to recover for the loss. If the award is executed in duplicate and delivered to each party, it also is published, or delivery of the award to the insured, if he prevails, and notice by him to the company, with a demand for payment, is a publication. Plummer v. Morrill, 48 Maine, 184. Knowlton v. Homer, 80 Maine, 552. Rixford v. Nye, 20 Vt. 132. Or it may be published by the arbitrators reading the award to the parties. Rundell v. La Fleur, 6 Allen, 480. But whatever form may be adopted, it is clearly implied by the clause of arbitration, that to be effective and complete, the award must be transmitted to the parties, or published by giving notice to them of the decision. Kingsley v. Bill, 9 Mass. 198. The plaintiff having failed to bring himself within the condition, the judge correctly ruled, that the action could not be maintained.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Braley, J.

The exceptions are meagre almost to the point of obscurity, but we assume that the policy was issued under R L. c. 118, § 60, and that the terms of the policy required as a condition precedent to any right of action, that the amount of loss should be ascertained by arbitration. Bub if the judge was satisfied that arbitrators were duly chosen, who met, heard the parties, and prepared and signed an award determining the loss on the plaintiff’s stock and furniture, he also found that it was not delivered, or notice of their decision communicated to either party. The form of submission is not before us. It may have been oral or in writing, and may or may not have provided that notice should be given. The company, however, declined to adjust the insurance after notice and proof of loss had been given, and, if we infer that thereupon at the plaintiff’s request three referees were selected as stated in the record, the purpose of the arbitration clause would be nullified, unless in some suitable form the result of the reference was made known to the plaintiff and the defendant. The board acts as an arbitral tribunal whose [579]*579decision, if accepted by the insurer, determines the amount of liability, while, if rejected, the insured may sue at once to recover for the loss. If the award is executed in duplicate and delivered to each party, it also is published, or delivery of the award to the insured, if he prevails, and notice by him to the company, with a demand for payment, is a publication. Plummer v. Morrill, 48 Maine, 184. Knowlton v. Homer, 80 Maine, 552. Rixford v. Nye, 20 Vt. 132. Or it may be published by the arbitrators reading the award to the parties. Rundell v. La Fleur, 6 Allen, 480. But whatever form may be adopted, it is clearly implied by the clause of arbitration, that to be effective and complete, the award must be transmitted to the parties, or published by giving notice to them of the decision. Kingsley v. Bill, 9 Mass. 198. The plaintiff having failed to bring himself within the condition, the judge correctly ruled, that the action could not be maintained.

Exceptions overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 N.E. 411, 208 Mass. 577, 1911 Mass. LEXIS 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weisman-v-firemens-insurance-mass-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack