Weiskircher v. Connelly
93 A. 1068, 248 Pa. 327, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 570
Opinion
We havé not been persuaded that any fact found by the learned chancellor beloiv should be disturbed. His legal conclusions properly followed his findings, and the decree of the court below, based upon both, is therefore affirmed.
Appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weiskircher v. Connelly, 93 A. 1068, 248 Pa. 327, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 570 (Pa. 1915).
93 A. 1068 (Weiskircher v. Connelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jacobs, G. v. Stephens, T.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2022
McAdoo, A. v. Caruso, C.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Kapcsos, A. v. Benshoff, M.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Ward, S. v. Arnold, M.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2015
Bednar v. Bednar
688 A.2d 1200 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1997)
James v. Commissioner
1995 T.C. Memo. 562 (U.S. Tax Court, 1995)
Fascione v. Fascione
416 A.2d 1023 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
Wilson v. McHale
61 Pa. D. & C. 444 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1947)
Sivak Estate
53 A.2d 858 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1947)
United States National Bank v. Campbell
47 A.2d 697 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1946)