Weiskircher v. Connelly
93 A. 1068, 248 Pa. 327, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 570
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 1, 1915
DocketAppeal, No. 218
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases
This text of 93 A. 1068 (Weiskircher v. Connelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Weiskircher v. Connelly, 93 A. 1068, 248 Pa. 327, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 570 (Pa. 1915).
Opinion
We havé not been persuaded that any fact found by the learned chancellor beloiv should be disturbed. His legal conclusions properly followed his findings, and the decree of the court below, based upon both, is therefore affirmed.
Appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jacobs, G. v. Stephens, T.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2022
McAdoo, A. v. Caruso, C.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Kapcsos, A. v. Benshoff, M.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Ward, S. v. Arnold, M.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2015
Bednar v. Bednar
688 A.2d 1200 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1997)
James v. Commissioner
1995 T.C. Memo. 562 (U.S. Tax Court, 1995)
Fascione v. Fascione
416 A.2d 1023 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
Wilson v. McHale
61 Pa. D. & C. 444 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1947)
Sivak Estate
53 A.2d 858 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1947)
United States National Bank v. Campbell
47 A.2d 697 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1946)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
93 A. 1068, 248 Pa. 327, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiskircher-v-connelly-pa-1915.