Weisinger v. WeisInger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weisinger v. WeisInger

174 A.D.2d 665, 572 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9424

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 17, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 174 A.D.2d 665 (Weisinger v. WeisInger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weisinger v. WeisInger, 174 A.D.2d 665, 572 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9424 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by a judgment dated March 21, 1986, the defendant former wife appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Capilli, J.), dated December 20, 1989, which limited to $5,000 her award of attorneys’ fees for defending the plaintiff former husband’s applications for post-judgment relief.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in limiting the defendant’s award of counsel fees to $5,000 (see, DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879, 881; Maloney v Maloney, 137 AD2d 666, 669). Bracken, J. P., Eiber, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by a judgment dated March 21, 1986, the defendant former wife appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Capilli, J.), dated December 20, 1989, which limited to $5,000 her award of attorneys’ fees for defending the plaintiff former husband’s applications for post-judgment relief.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in limiting the defendant’s award of counsel fees to $5,000 (see, DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879, 881; Maloney v Maloney, 137 AD2d 666, 669). Bracken, J. P., Eiber, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 A.D.2d 665, 572 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weisinger-v-weisinger-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack