WeiserMazars Wealth Advisors, LLC v. Schatzki

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

WeiserMazars Wealth Advisors, LLC v. Schatzki

135 A.D.3d 626, 22 N.Y.S.3d 874

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 26, 2016

Docket8 650877/14

StatusPublished

This text of 135 A.D.3d 626 (WeiserMazars Wealth Advisors, LLC v. Schatzki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

WeiserMazars Wealth Advisors, LLC v. Schatzki, 135 A.D.3d 626, 22 N.Y.S.3d 874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffery K. Oing, J.), entered December 10, 2014, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on res judicata grounds, unanimously modified, on the law, to base the dismissal on the grounds of a prior action pending, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

At oral argument the parties agreed that dismissal should be premised on the ground that there is a prior Federal action pending. Concur — Friedman, J.P, Renwick, Saxe and Moskowitz, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffery K. Oing, J.), entered December 10, 2014, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on res judicata grounds, unanimously modified, on the law, to base the dismissal on the grounds of a prior action pending, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

At oral argument the parties agreed that dismissal should be premised on the ground that there is a prior Federal action pending. Concur — Friedman, J.P, Renwick, Saxe and Moskowitz, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 A.D.3d 626, 22 N.Y.S.3d 874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weisermazars-wealth-advisors-llc-v-schatzki-nyappdiv-2016.