WeiserMazars Wealth Advisors, LLC v. Schatzki

135 A.D.3d 626, 22 N.Y.S.3d 874
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 26, 2016·No. 8 650877/14·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffery K. Oing, J.), entered December 10, 2014, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on res judicata grounds, unanimously modified, on the law, to base the dismissal on the grounds of a prior action pending, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

At oral argument the parties agreed that dismissal should be premised on the ground that there is a prior Federal action pending. Concur — Friedman, J.P, Renwick, Saxe and Moskowitz, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WeiserMazars Wealth Advisors, LLC v. Schatzki, 135 A.D.3d 626, 22 N.Y.S.3d 874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

135 A.D.3d 626 (WeiserMazars Wealth Advisors, LLC v. Schatzki) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.