Weiser v. Bierbrouwerij

430 So. 2d 986, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22437
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 10, 1983·No. No. 82-1797·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court on its own motion, more than one year after a cause had been removed to' the local Federal District Court, dismissed the cause for lack of prosecution.

We reverse with directions to reinstate the cause. Once a matter is removed to the federal court, a state trial court and its judge have no jurisdiction over the matter and cannot dismiss it. Rutas Aereas Nacionales, S.A. v. Cauley & Martin, Inc., 160 So.2d 168 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964); Medrano v. Texas, 580 F.2d 803 (5th Cir.1978); Hop-son v. North American Insurance Company, 71 Idaho 461, 233 P.2d 799 (1951); People v. Martin-Trigona, 28 Ill.App.3d 605, 328 N.E.2d 362 (1975); 28 U.S.C., Sec. 1446(e).

Reversed and remanded with directions.1

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weiser v. Bierbrouwerij, 430 So. 2d 986, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22437 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

430 So. 2d 986 (Weiser v. Bierbrouwerij) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Amos Camille v. Miami-Dade County, MDCR
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025
Preston v. Allstate Insurance Co.
627 So. 2d 1322 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Hiroko Sugimoto v. Exportadora De Sal, S.A. De C.V.
233 Cal. App. 3d 165 (California Court of Appeal, 1991)