Weisenberg v. Sass

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weisenberg v. Sass

209 A.D.2d 424, 619 N.Y.S.2d 597

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 7, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 209 A.D.2d 424 (Weisenberg v. Sass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weisenberg v. Sass, 209 A.D.2d 424, 619 N.Y.S.2d 597 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to confirm an arbitration award of a Beth Din, dated November 20, 1991, Paul Sass appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kassoff, J.), dated April 20, 1993, which, inter alia, granted the petition, confirmed the award, and denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the petition.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The record supports the Supreme Court’s finding that the appellant, Paul Sass, participated in the arbitration proceeding before the Beth Din. Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court properly confirmed the award of the Beth Din (CPLR 7511 [b] [1]; see, MVAIC v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 150 AD2d 215). Sullivan, J. P., Balletta, Lawrence and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to confirm an arbitration award of a Beth Din, dated November 20, 1991, Paul Sass appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kassoff, J.), dated April 20, 1993, which, inter alia, granted the petition, confirmed the award, and denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the petition.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The record supports the Supreme Court’s finding that the appellant, Paul Sass, participated in the arbitration proceeding before the Beth Din. Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court properly confirmed the award of the Beth Din (CPLR 7511 [b] [1]; see, MVAIC v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 150 AD2d 215). Sullivan, J. P., Balletta, Lawrence and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 A.D.2d 424, 619 N.Y.S.2d 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weisenberg-v-sass-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack