Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Weisburst v. Dreifus

Weisburst v. Dreifus

58 A.D.3d 402, 869 N.Y.S.2d 781
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 6, 2009
StatusPublished

This text of 58 A.D.3d 402 (Weisburst v. Dreifus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weisburst v. Dreifus, 58 A.D.3d 402, 869 N.Y.S.2d 781 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saralee Evans, J.), entered June 25, 2008, which, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff’s motion for an interim award of attorney’s fees, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The record does not show that defendant has significantly greater financial resources at her disposal than plaintiff has [403]*403(Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a]; O’Shea v O’Shea, 93 NY2d 187, 190 [1999]; Charpié v Charpié, 271 AD2d 169 [2000]).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining contention and find it unavailing. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Mazzarelli, Sweeny, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Shea v. O'Shea
711 N.E.2d 193 (New York Court of Appeals, 1999)
Charpié v. Charpié
271 A.D.2d 169 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 A.D.3d 402, 869 N.Y.S.2d 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weisburst-v-dreifus-nyappdiv-2009.