Weisbard v. Ward & Caggiano, P.A.
This text of 738 So. 2d 1024 (Weisbard v. Ward & Caggiano, P.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the final summary judgment. Appellees have failed to show the absence of any genuine issue of material fact as to the question of whether there was an undisclosed agreement, between Appellees and the referring attorney, to pay a referral fee out of their contingency fee. Without commenting on the weight of the proof, there is evidence in support of Appellants’ claim. With regard to further proceedings after remand, we direct the trial court’s attention to Chandris, S.A. v. Yanakakis, 668 So.2d 180 (Fla.1995).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
738 So. 2d 1024, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10998, 1999 WL 625558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weisbard-v-ward-caggiano-pa-fladistctapp-1999.