Weisback v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

453 A.2d 1091, 71 Pa. Commw. 41, 1983 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1190
CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 5, 1983
DocketAppeal, No. 1585 C.D. 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 453 A.2d 1091 (Weisback v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weisback v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 453 A.2d 1091, 71 Pa. Commw. 41, 1983 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1190 (Pa. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

The petitioner, an unemployment compensation claimant, appeals from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board), denying her benefits as a voluntary quit pursuant to Section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 P.S. §802(b).

The petitioner was employed by the Fraternal Order of Police Senior Citizens, Inc. for four and one-half years as a secretary-bookkeeper at a retiree’s home conducted .by her employer. On February 12, 1980, she left her work. She testified at the referee’s hearing that she left because she had been assignd to acquaint a. newly appointed superintendent with the work; that

he made it very difficult for me to try to teach him and my nerves got so bad that on the 12th I just figured I’m tired talking to this man, he didn’t want to do anything that I showed him, he complained all the time, and I just quit and walked right out.

The referee and Board found that the claimant quit her job on account of dissatisfaction with the work and thus was ineligible for benefits. This finding is plainly supported by substantial evidence. The claimant also complains that the work of instructing a new [43]*43superintendent caused her to he nervous. She did not, however, bring this fact to the attention of her employer and there is no evidence which would support a finding that her health required her to quit. See Genetin v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Pa. , A.2d (No. 9 W.D. Appeal Dkt. 1982, filed November 4, 1982).

Order affirmed.

Order

And Now, this 5th day of January, 1983, the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, dated May 22, 1981, is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
473 A.2d 235 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
453 A.2d 1091, 71 Pa. Commw. 41, 1983 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weisback-v-commonwealth-unemployment-compensation-board-of-review-pacommwct-1983.