Home/Supreme Court of Arkansas/Weir v. Hill

Weir v. Hill

377 S.W.2d 178, 237 Ark. 922, 1964 Ark. LEXIS 388
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedApril 6, 1964
Docket5-3253
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 377 S.W.2d 178 (Weir v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weir v. Hill, 377 S.W.2d 178, 237 Ark. 922, 1964 Ark. LEXIS 388 (Ark. 1964).

Opinion

Gteorge Rose Smith, J.

This appears to he an action brought by the appellee to recover judgment upon six promissory notes executed by the appellant. We do not reach the merits, for under Rule 9 we are compelled to affirm the the judgment. The appellant has submitted only a statement of the case, a list of the points relied upon for reversal, and a brief. There is no abstract of the pleadings, the judgment, or the testimony that was heard below. To determine the facts in the case we should have to explore the record, which is contrary to our practice. Vire v. Vire, 236 Ark. 740, 368 S. W. 2d 265.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reliable Finance Co. v. Rhodes
483 S.W.2d 187 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1972)
Love v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins.
407 S.W.2d 118 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1966)
Kelley v. Southern Pulpwood Co.
396 S.W.2d 305 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1965)
Hurley v. Owens
385 S.W.2d 636 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1965)
Dickson v. Harpole
384 S.W.2d 472 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
377 S.W.2d 178, 237 Ark. 922, 1964 Ark. LEXIS 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weir-v-hill-ark-1964.