Weir v. Hill

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Weir v. Hill

377 S.W.2d 178, 237 Ark. 922, 1964 Ark. LEXIS 388

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided April 6, 1964·No. 5-3253·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Gteorge Rose Smith, J.

This appears to he an action brought by the appellee to recover judgment upon six promissory notes executed by the appellant. We do not reach the merits, for under Rule 9 we are compelled to affirm the the judgment. The appellant has submitted only a statement of the case, a list of the points relied upon for reversal, and a brief. There is no abstract of the pleadings, the judgment, or the testimony that was heard below. To determine the facts in the case we should have to explore the record, which is contrary to our practice. Vire v. Vire, 236 Ark. 740, 368 S. W. 2d 265.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gteorge Rose Smith, J.

This appears to he an action brought by the appellee to recover judgment upon six promissory notes executed by the appellant. We do not reach the merits, for under Rule 9 we are compelled to affirm the the judgment. The appellant has submitted only a statement of the case, a list of the points relied upon for reversal, and a brief. There is no abstract of the pleadings, the judgment, or the testimony that was heard below. To determine the facts in the case we should have to explore the record, which is contrary to our practice. Vire v. Vire, 236 Ark. 740, 368 S. W. 2d 265.

Affirmed.

Weir v. Hill, 377 S.W.2d 178, 237 Ark. 922, 1964 Ark. LEXIS 388 (Ark. 1964).

Pincite

377 S.W.2d 178 (Weir v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related