Weir v. County of Allegheny
95 Pa. 413, 1880 Pa. LEXIS 339
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered
The demand of the plaintiff was for damages resulting from the riot of 1877, and was given to him by a special statute. It was to recover for property actually destroyed- and not for any consequential injuries such as the suspension of business. We adopt the opinion of the learned president of the court below upon the questions of law reserved on the special verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weir v. County of Allegheny, 95 Pa. 413, 1880 Pa. LEXIS 339 (Pa. 1880).
95 Pa. 413 (Weir v. County of Allegheny) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
W. D. Rubright Co. v. International Harvester Co.
358 F. Supp. 1388 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1973)
Kendall v. United Air Lines, Inc. Sebo v. United Air Lines, Inc.
200 F.2d 269 (Second Circuit, 1952)
Santangelo v. Montgomery County
23 Pa. D. & C. 1 (Montgomery County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1935)
Witmer v. Bessemer & Lake Erie R. R.
88 A. 314 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)
Richards v. Citizens Natural Gas Co.
18 A. 600 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1889)