Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Weintritt v. Triple-J Enterprises, Inc.

Weintritt v. Triple-J Enterprises, Inc.

554 So. 2d 25, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7397, 1989 WL 153623
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 22, 1989·No. No. 88-432·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Finding that competent substantial evidence provided a rational predicate for the jury verdict in this ease and that it does not clearly appear that the jury ignored the evidence or misperceived the merits of the case, we affirm. We decline to award attorneys’ fees to either side. See Heindel v. Southside Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 476 So.2d 266 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

SMITH, ZEHMER and MINER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weintritt v. Triple-J Enterprises, Inc., 554 So. 2d 25, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7397, 1989 WL 153623 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

554 So. 2d 25 (Weintritt v. Triple-J Enterprises, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heindel v. Southside Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.
476 So. 2d 266 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)