Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Weintritt v. Triple-J Enterprises, Inc.

Weintritt v. Triple-J Enterprises, Inc.

554 So. 2d 25, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7397, 1989 WL 153623
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 22, 1989
DocketNo. 88-432
StatusPublished

This text of 554 So. 2d 25 (Weintritt v. Triple-J Enterprises, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weintritt v. Triple-J Enterprises, Inc., 554 So. 2d 25, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7397, 1989 WL 153623 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Finding that competent substantial evidence provided a rational predicate for the jury verdict in this ease and that it does not clearly appear that the jury ignored the evidence or misperceived the merits of the case, we affirm. We decline to award attorneys’ fees to either side. See Heindel v. Southside Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 476 So.2d 266 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

SMITH, ZEHMER and MINER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heindel v. Southside Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.
476 So. 2d 266 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
554 So. 2d 25, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7397, 1989 WL 153623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weintritt-v-triple-j-enterprises-inc-fladistctapp-1989.