Weintraub v. Weintraub
756 So. 2d 1092, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5251, 2000 WL 525708
Opinion
On Motion for Rehearing Denied
By motion for rehearing, the father argues that we have misapprehended Roshkind v. Roshkind, 717 So.2d 545 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), and asks that we take judicial notice of the Fourth District Court of Appeal record in that case. We decline to do so. See Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners v. Public Employees Relations Commission, 424 So.2d 132, 134 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). We rely on the face of the Roshkind opinion as written.
Rehearing denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weintraub v. Weintraub, 756 So. 2d 1092, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5251, 2000 WL 525708 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
756 So. 2d 1092 (Weintraub v. Weintraub) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners v. Public Employees Relations Commission
424 So. 2d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Roshkind v. Roshkind
717 So. 2d 545 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)