Weintraub v. Weinstein
This text of 154 So. 2d 846 (Weintraub v. Weinstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an interlocutory appeal from an order of the chancellor denying defendant’s motion for summary decree. This order, as all orders, decrees and judgments brought to this court, comes to us with a presumption of correctness. We have carefully reviewed the record and conclude that the appellant has failed to make it clearly appear that the chancellor’s ruling was erroneous.
This shall not be construed as holding that the facts pleaded by the appellee would be admissible into evidence at trial. Accordingly, the order appealed is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
154 So. 2d 846, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weintraub-v-weinstein-fladistctapp-1963.