Weintraub v. Weinstein

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Weintraub v. Weinstein

154 So. 2d 846, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3339

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 9, 1963·No. No. 63-177·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order of the chancellor denying defendant’s motion for summary decree. This order, as all orders, decrees and judgments brought to this court, comes to us with a presumption of correctness. We have carefully reviewed the record and conclude that the appellant has failed to make it clearly appear that the chancellor’s ruling was erroneous.

This shall not be construed as holding that the facts pleaded by the appellee would be admissible into evidence at trial. Accordingly, the order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order of the chancellor denying defendant’s motion for summary decree. This order, as all orders, decrees and judgments brought to this court, comes to us with a presumption of correctness. We have carefully reviewed the record and conclude that the appellant has failed to make it clearly appear that the chancellor’s ruling was erroneous.

This shall not be construed as holding that the facts pleaded by the appellee would be admissible into evidence at trial. Accordingly, the order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Weintraub v. Weinstein, 154 So. 2d 846, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3339 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

154 So. 2d 846 (Weintraub v. Weinstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related