Weintraub v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Weintraub v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.

156 N.E. 214, 115 Ohio St. 731, 115 Ohio St. (N.S.) 731, 1926 Ohio LEXIS 248

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 16, 1926

Docket19005

StatusPublished

This text of 156 N.E. 214 (Weintraub v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weintraub v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co., 156 N.E. 214, 115 Ohio St. 731, 115 Ohio St. (N.S.) 731, 1926 Ohio LEXIS 248 (Ohio 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

It appearing that the judges of the court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of the case (one of the judges not participating) and are unable for that reason to agree upon a judgment, the entry of this fact constitutes an affirmance of the judgment of the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Matthias, Day and Kinkade, JJ., concur. Jones, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appearing that the judges of the court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of the case (one of the judges not participating) and are unable for that reason to agree upon a judgment, the entry of this fact constitutes an affirmance of the judgment of the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Matthias, Day and Kinkade, JJ., concur. Jones, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 N.E. 214, 115 Ohio St. 731, 115 Ohio St. (N.S.) 731, 1926 Ohio LEXIS 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weintraub-v-ohio-bell-telephone-co-ohio-1926.