Weintraub v. M. B. & G.D. Daniels

30 F.2d 550, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2447
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided January 7, 1929·No. No. 3913·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the conclusion reached by the judge of the court below. 30 F.(2d) 548. In view, amongst others, of the allegations of the petition that the bankrupt was insolvent, and knew of his insolvency, we are of opinion that the judge was justified in his decree, which is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weintraub v. M. B. & G.D. Daniels, 30 F.2d 550, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2447 (3d Cir. 1929).

30 F.2d 550 (Weintraub v. M. B. & G.D. Daniels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Richenell Fabric Mfg. Co.
31 F. Supp. 645 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1940)