Weintraub v. M. B. & G.D. Daniels
30 F.2d 550, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2447
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJanuary 7, 1929
DocketNo. 3913
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 30 F.2d 550 (Weintraub v. M. B. & G.D. Daniels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Weintraub v. M. B. & G.D. Daniels, 30 F.2d 550, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2447 (3d Cir. 1929).
Opinion
We find no error in the conclusion reached by the judge of the court below. 30 F.(2d) 548. In view, amongst others, of the allegations of the petition that the bankrupt was insolvent, and knew of his insolvency, we are of opinion that the judge was justified in his decree, which is hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Richenell Fabric Mfg. Co.
31 F. Supp. 645 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1940)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
30 F.2d 550, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weintraub-v-m-b-gd-daniels-ca3-1929.