Weintraub v. Kruse
192 A.D. 925
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1920·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Order and judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. We think that the memorandum jointly signed was sufficient. (See Tobias v. Lynch, ante, p. 54, decided herewith.) Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concur.
For amended decision, see post, p. 926.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weintraub v. Kruse, 192 A.D. 925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).
192 A.D. 925 (Weintraub v. Kruse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Weintraub v. Kruse
195 A.D. 807 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)